Why Nuggets are using Jamal Murray, Russell Westbrook together

Why Nuggets are using Jamal Murray, Russell Westbrook together

This is more discomfort than the Nuggets are used to feeling in their stomachs.

Their three-time MVP isn’t saying much to calm it. After his 41-point outburst went to waste Saturday afternoon, Nikola Jokic was asked by what point in the season he feels the Nuggets need to have themselves figured out. He responded, with the same frankness that he used this week to call them a bad shooting team, “probably yesterday.”

Meanwhile, Jokic’s longtime point guard recommends Pepto Bismol.

“I have a more in-depth picture of us than everybody looking from the outside in, but we won a championship with most of the guys that have been here,” Jamal Murray said after Denver’s 109-104 loss to the Clippers. “We’ve been here together for a while. We have trust in everybody. … I think we’re gradually getting better; it’s just not translating into wins yet.”

This is only the second season of Jokic’s career that Denver has started 0-2. After Saturday’s games, the Nuggets ranked last in the NBA in team offensive rating at 97.4, albeit still with a comically small sample size. And now the comforts of home will be abandoned as they try to correct course on a three-game road trip, starting Monday night in Toronto.

Murray’s health, production and lineup deployment are major aspects of the uncertainty surrounding the 2023 champions. But he came to his team’s defense — particularly regarding its depth and 3-point shooting — after an individual performance that was up to standard. He went for 22 points and five assists on 7-of-14 shooting, including 3 of 6 from outside.

“P-Wat (Peyton Watson) is coming back from injury, and we know he can make, and we know what he’s capable of on both ends,” Murray said. “CB (Christian Braun) is taking the leap.”

Braun’s fit in the starting lineup has been low on the list of problems. He has scored in double figures both games while providing impressive on-ball defense against Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and James Harden. In its 48 minutes together, the slightly new-look starting five has a net rating of 14.1. Michael Porter Jr.’s shooting slump aside, it has mostly picked up where it left off with Kentavious Caldwell-Pope.

The hole left behind in the second unit by Braun’s promotion is another story.

Denver’s bench has started the season 10 for 46 from the field (21.7%). The four rotation players behind Michael Malone’s starting lineup combined for just five rebounds against Los Angeles, accentuating the unit’s lack of size. Defensively, it has been inconsistent. Dario Saric struggled to size up to his countryman Ivica Zubac, a more traditional center, who amassed 24 points and 15 rebounds for the Clippers.

“A lot of it’s coming from chemistry,” Murray said of the slow start. “I remember I was running the break today, and I didn’t know if I should go to the two or the three. … We were talking about some of that stuff in the locker room.”

Murray has played in the second unit both games, though to a lesser degree on Saturday. In 11 minutes during the season-opener, a bench lineup featuring Murray as the lone stagger registered a minus-37.3 net rating, 37.9% rebounding rate and 38.3% true shooting percentage.

Staggering Murray is nothing new in Denver, but the fit has been awkward so far this season with only one ball to share between him and Russell Westbrook (who defended respectably Saturday but missed all eight of his shot attempts).

The Nuggets’ interest in Westbrook this summer was in part associated with his potential to push Murray competitively in practice. Whether they complement each other in games remains to be seen, but their first 21 minutes together have been a minus-28.9 net.

“Jamal’s a guard. He’s been a one. He’s been a two,” Malone said after the opener, reiterating what he has long believed. “In college, he was a two. It’s just that, for his Nuggets tenure, Jamal has been a guy that can be a starting one, and he can play with a point guard in the second unit. I think Russ and Jamal have a lot of potential to be really good together.”


Source link

Bruce Springsteen Endorsed Harris—But Bill Murray Didn’t Endorse Trump

Just weeks after Vice President Kamala Harris received the endorsement of pop superstar, rock legend Bruce Springsteen threw his support behind her as well. In a video post on Instagram, the 75-year-old rocker—who is known simply as “The Boss”—suggested this is “one of the most consequential elections in our nation’s history.”

The “Born in the USA” singer further offered a critique of former President Donald Trump, while he lamented the fact that the nation is as “politically, spiritually and emotionally divided” as at any time since the American Civil War.

“It doesn’t have to be this way,” Springsteen added.

The endorsement wasn’t entirely surprising, as Springsteen has a long history of backing Democrats. He previously endorsed Barack Obama in 2008, and in the 2020 U.S. presidential election provided a narration for a Joe Biden campaign ad while the song “My Hometown” played in the background.

Whether Springsteen’s endorsement will move the needle in this year’s razor-close election isn’t clear, it likely could cost him some fans due to the deep political divide he warned about.

“Steve Van Zandt was quoted recently as saying Bruce’s political views had cost the band a lot of fans,” explained Bruce Barber, professional in residence at the University of New Haven and general manager of radio station WNHU. “He’s probably right—but that to me is what a true artist is all about, the ability to speak truths, in words and song, regardless of the consequences. Springsteen’s support for Kamala Harris is definitely not a surprise, but it’s another example of his undying commitment to being genuine in his art and his personal life.”

What About Bill?

Just as Springsteen released his endorsement of Harris, it was another celebrity that went viral on Thursday—namely, What About Bob? actor Bill Murray for his alleged backing of Trump.

Internet personality Bo Loudon posted a clip of Murray from 2016 “praising” some of the former president’s policies, and suggested “Who needs Taylor Swift when you have BILL MURRAY?”

The clip, which was seen nearly six million times, seemed to convince many that the Ghost Busters star had endorsed Trump. However, as of Friday afternoon, Bill Murray has been silent on the issue and hasn’t endorsed either candidate. According to Vanity Fair, Murray had campaigned for the Green Party’s Ralph Nader in the 2000 presidential race—but perhaps that was “lost in translation.”

Murray would just be the latest celebrity to see his/her/their endorsement of a candidate—even if it wasn’t made. Such endorsements might barely move the needle, but given how close this race is every single vote is going to matter.

“Celebrity endorsements are very important in today’s political world,” said Dr. Julianna Kirschner, lecturer at the Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism at the University of Southern California.

“Taylor Swift’s endorsement of Kamala Harris and Tim Walz has made notable political, cultural, and social waves. Likewise, other celebrities endorsing candidates can have a similar ripple effect,” added Kirschner.

Expect More Faux Endorsements

A video clip from eight years ago is hardly an endorsement, but it was enough for many to believe that Murray was a Trump supporter.

“Without any corroborating evidence, the comment’s validity appears dubious at best,” suggested Kirschner. “News organizations verify facts from several sources before broadcasting them, which is the likely reason for a lack of reporting on the subject. All we have right now is conjecture, a premise through which misinformation on social media thrives.”

These faux endorsements are just the latest form of misinformation that we’ve seen this election cycle. In this particular case, the video is just enough to make the story seem credible.

“Misinformation booms when information cannot be validated. In this case, Murray’s position is unclear,” added Kirschner. “Users may double down when presented with contrasting information is presented to them. There is plenty of research that would support the likelihood of such an outcome. Given the high chances of users doubling down, the possibility of celebrity endorsements moving the needle would be small but not insignificant. In the tight race we are in, everything, no matter how small, makes a difference.”

How Should Celebrities Respond?

The other side of this story is that Swift and Springsteen could receive some backlash from fans, but as Barber noted, the Boss likely knew it going in. In Murray’s case, he could face scrutiny for something he didn’t even do.

As an A-lister, he likely won’t be impacted; yet, we could see the careers of up-and-comers affected—perhaps running afoul of a casting director, movie producer, publicist, etc.

“From the celebrity’s perspective, they should be concerned with how they are politically represented online. This can affect their reputation and potential support from fans, which inevitably allows them to continue to do their work,” Kirschner continued.

And the problem could get worse. Murray may have actually offered his past comments in an interview, but advances in deep fakes could soon put words into the mouths of celebrities—living and dead alike!

“As AI becomes more advanced, it is likely that comments, images, and videos of what appears to be celebrities endorsing a candidate may be outright false,” warned Kirschner. “As cases like Murray’s attributed comment come up in the future, it will become increasingly challenging to discern fact from fiction.”


Source link